What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

How Many Denominations Became Actively Opposed To God’s Chosen People

By Ty Perry for
Harbinger's Daily

Toying with the Bible is like a game of Jenga: Rejecting one scriptural doctrine leads to the collapse of a truly Biblical worldview.

Many of America’s mainline denominations began playing this theological Jenga in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Having rejected fundamental Christian doctrines, they pulled down many denominational towers. What’s left of their milquetoast doctrine is motivated more by trending notions of social justice than “thus saith the Lord.”

In reality, their rejection of Biblical doctrine and efforts to be on the “right side of history” oppose God’s Word on most fronts, including what He has to say about Israel. Several mainline denominations even work actively against Israel.

In July 2021, the United Church of Christ (UCC), long unmoored from the Bible, condemned Israel alone for the conflict in the Middle East. Its declaration asserted, “The continued oppression of the Palestinian people . . . represents a sin in violation of the message of the Biblical prophets and the Gospel.”

Despite its appeal to Scripture, the resolution interprets figuratively passages like Genesis 12:3 that support Israel’s right to the Promised Land. The UCC believes interpreting literally such passages enables Israel’s alleged sin of repossessing its land. The denomination condemns Christian Zionism “as a theology and an ideology that legitimize the right of one people to deny the human rights of another” and as “a grave misuse of the Bible.”

The declaration further accuses Israel of abusing the Palestinians for more than 70 years. The problem, in the UCC’s view, stretches back to the State of Israel’s birth in 1948. Their issue is not with specific Israeli policies; it’s with Israel’s very existence.

The denomination even compares Israel’s alleged maltreatment of Palestinians to “conditions . . . in force under Jim Crow in the United States south.” It also labels the Jewish return to the land “a current-day form of settler colonialism, actively engaged in the removal and erasure of the indigenous Palestinian population.”

That a denomination rooted in New England Puritanism became so disengaged from Scripture that it turned on God’s Chosen People is astonishing. But, sadly, the UCC is not alone.

In 2022, the Presbyterian Church (USA) (PC[USA]) also sided against Israel, declaring the nation an apartheid state and condemning Christian Zionism. The PC(USA) decried Jerusalem’s change “in the direction of a heightened Zionist-Jewish identity.” It charged that the Israeli military exercises an “increasingly apartheid-like control over Palestinians” and that Christian Zionism is built on doctrines that “tend toward idolatry and heresy.”

The denomination directed all PC(USA)-affiliated agencies, representatives, and congregants to avoid Jewish Zionist narratives about Israel by including “encounters with the stories and concerns of Palestinians in any travel itinerary to the Holy Land, and to make use of Palestinian providers of services whenever possible, given the obstacles they face.”

Other denominations, including the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Alliance of Baptists, the Mennonite Central Committee, and the Episcopal Church, have issued similar anti-Israel statements or divested from companies that do business in Israel.

Unfortunately, these denominations not only ignore Scripture and history but also engage in a key manifestation of modern antisemitism: holding the Jewish state to a double standard.

Nowhere in their statements do these denominations condemn or even mention Palestinian terror tunnels or the brutal murder of Jewish people by Arab terrorists.

Before preaching to Israel about its alleged “sin” of existence, these denominations should examine how far they have drifted from the Word of God. Within its pages, they would find that God’s calling and gifts, including that of the land of Israel to His Chosen People, “are irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29).

Ty Perry is the assistant to the director of North American Ministries for The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry

 
Yesterday Pastor Andy Woods in his sermon series on Calvinism teaches things about the Reformed churches that were new to me. A majority of them are not dispensational and they teach that Israel is not in God's future plans. (Most of that I knew, but when he explains some of the reasons why our dispensational view of Scripture threatens their works based salvation, it blew my mind!)

Many of America’s mainline denominations began playing this theological Jenga in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Having rejected fundamental Christian doctrines, they pulled down many denominational towers.
The 19th century was pivotal in many ways. Popularity for Darwinism, German Higher Criticism, Marxism, and in Europe churches that hadn't shaken off their governments. Some believers fought hard against that.

There were many solid preachers in Europe, and some from the US who would draw huge revivals. Two of them who I've learned more about are DL Moody and CH Spurgeon. Both stood on biblical authenticity of dispensational worldviews and fought hard against Darwinism and German Higher Criticism. They boldly claimed the Bible as authority in all matters, including creation and history. I was delighted to learn that both believed in a literal Israel returning.

Anyhow, here's the sermon on Calvinism that I referred to: Neo Calvinism vs The Bible 007
 
I haven't listened to the last couple of Andy Woods sermons on Calvinism yet, I need to get caught up on it.

Supersessionism or replacement theology has also infiltrated many denominations and its core is anti-semetic. When someone is taught that the Church has taken the place of Israel and that God no longer has a purpose or plan for them, then it often time leads to an indifference or even hatred for the Jewish people.
I've encountered those who also take that belief system even farther and think we are still under the dispensation of Law (many of the cults that I don't consider denominations) and want to place the burden of salvation back on the individuals adherence of laws and not trusting solely on the finished work of Christ.

I really detest how some of these "denominations" are leading their church attenders into heresies and antisemitism. People have a scriptural obligation to look into what the bible actually teaches compared to what is being taught from the pulpit.
 
To those who believe that God has broken His Covenant with Israel and has replaced them with the Church, they aren't reading the Bible. Paul expresses the truth about this in Romans 11.

"if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive tree, were grafted in among them, and with them became a partaker of the root and fatness of the olive tree, 18 do not boast against the branches. But if you do boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you.

19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off that I might be grafted in.”
20 Well said. Because of unbelief they were broken off, and you stand by faith. Do not be haughty, but fear. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, He may not spare you either.
22 Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God: on those who fell, severity; but toward you, goodness, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise you also will be cut off. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.
24 For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?

25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:

“The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob;
27 For this is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.”

28 Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.30 For as you were once disobedient to God, yet have now obtained mercy through their disobedience,
31 even so these also have now been disobedient, that through the mercy shown you they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all."
Romans 11:17-32
 
Yesterday Pastor Andy Woods in his sermon series on Calvinism teaches things about the Reformed churches that were new to me. A majority of them are not dispensational and they teach that Israel is not in God's future plans. (Most of that I knew, but when he explains some of the reasons why our dispensational view of Scripture threatens their works based salvation, it blew my mind!)


The 19th century was pivotal in many ways. Popularity for Darwinism, German Higher Criticism, Marxism, and in Europe churches that hadn't shaken off their governments. Some believers fought hard against that.

There were many solid preachers in Europe, and some from the US who would draw huge revivals. Two of them who I've learned more about are DL Moody and CH Spurgeon. Both stood on biblical authenticity of dispensational worldviews and fought hard against Darwinism and German Higher Criticism. They boldly claimed the Bible as authority in all matters, including creation and history. I was delighted to learn that both believed in a literal Israel returning.

Anyhow, here's the sermon on Calvinism that I referred to: Neo Calvinism vs The Bible 007
I knew they did it, just didn't fully understand why.

Thanks Hol, going to watch that today!!! Good stuff!
 
knew they did it, just didn't fully understand why.
I thought you'd be interested in this gem from DL Moody's book The Overcoming Life. He describes discussions from those who will be attending one of his conferences as they aggressively complain: 'He's not going to bring up that Noah's Ark story?? I thought that was given up by all intelligent people!' and I'll directly quote him: "I haven't given it up. When I do I am going to give up the whole Bible. There is hardly any portion of the Old Testament Scripture that the Son of God didn't place His seal on while He was here in this world." He goes on to say that Christ connected His own return to the flood event, and "I pity any man who picks the Word of God to pieces."

I've been pleasantly surprised as I learn more about these 1800s believers who did not buy into the darwinists or higher critics.
 
Back
Top