What's new
By:
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Gov. Tim Walz.’s Pro-choice stance include Infanticide.

Ronnie

Ronnie

Charter member
Ronnie said:
It looks like the Harris team found someone as much of a left wing extremist as she is.
Click to expand...

He's actually significantly left of her.

The killing and maiming here is horrific.

I'd like to live, but would be willing that God would SMITE this state into oblivion to save all those babies and prevent all the misery from transgender and FGM "healthcare." One of the worst things one can ever see is a grade-school-aged girl being more dragged/carried by two women while sort of "walking" like a crippled, hurt baby fawn into a healthcare clinic when something goes wrong with FGM :puke: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban: :ban:
 
I didn’t realize FGM was being forced upon girls in conservative, Chrisitan, America. I’m shocked by this women’s story and there are so many of them.

https://equalitynow.medium.com/female-genital-mutilation-in-white-conservative-america-46084d2cffb

I grew up in mid-West America, in a conservative, Christian home. There was a lot of focus on making women be submissive. Men were the leader of the household and girls were taught it was our job was to serve them. I believe this was the way everyone believed.

We did whatever men told us to do, and as far as sex was concerned our job was to pleasure them. But sex for pleasure was wrong for women. It was a sin against God and if you said anything or talked about sex that was a sin.

I was five when I underwent Female Genital Mutilation . . .
 
Ronnie said:
I’m honestly trying to follow you, sister, but it’s difficult. :hug:
Click to expand...

WARNING: Gross post.


Family-friendly board, so I was trying not to be too explicit, and still trying to keep it to a dull roar here as I explain.

Minnesota is a mecca for abortions. There's very little that is prohibited to an abortion clinic, to include killing babies that survive the abortion. Parental permission/notification not required for ladies 12 and over. Not sure how they handle the younger ladies.

Minnesota is a mecca for transgender "medical care." Hormones and surgery. No parental permission/notification.

Minnesota is a mecca for female genital mutilation (FGM), which is a muslim practice. It involves cutting out girls' sensitive bits and sewing stuff almost all closed except to facilitate #1 and monthly. Pretty much nothing happens to healthcare professionals that perform the procedure and mandated reporters, who do not report it. Bad things happen to mandated reporters, who do report it. Ditto no repercussions to the designated person(s) in the muslim community that do this. Summer is known as the "cutting season." Some girls from here or who are brought here are taken elsewhere (usually overseas), but come and go through the airport here because "easier" than other airports.

Minnesota medical facilities end up treating FGM victims because it often causes gynecological and urinary tract infections and malfunctions, and the procedure and aftermath of FGM procedure is incredibly painful.

Funding, facilities, and practitioners are being diverted from women's medical care (actual biological women XX gynecological and breast care, etc.) for all of these abominations, causing shortages/unavailability of biological women's regular medical care.


End of gross post
 
Sometimes I think that about all it would take for this transgender body mutilation of children nonsense to stop is for just one MN school to get involved in getting/helping a male Somalia student to transition to female. I would like to see the Somalia community react to that being done to one of their male children. That community would definitely respond by putting the fear of wrath in anyone ever considering getting involved in mutilating another child, as long as it’s a male. I don’t know how parents deal with this crap.
 
LydiaJoy said:
Sometimes I think that about all it would take for this transgender body mutilation of children nonsense to stop is for just one MN school to get involved in getting/helping a male Somalia student to transition to female. I would like to see the Somalia community react to that being done to one of their male children. That community would definitely respond by putting the fear of wrath in anyone ever considering getting involved in mutilating another child, as long as it’s a male. I don’t know how parents deal with this crap.
Click to expand...

muslim kids are off-limits for transgender stuff because the muslims and LGBTQABCXYZ are political allies in the US and Canada.
Little girls born to LGBTQABCXYZ parents are not exempt from FGM if parent(s) live in a muslim community or practice islam. If the parents don't have it done, the "religious police" in the muslim community will abduct, etc.
 
Here's the "official" Federal information about FGM

U.S. Government Fact Sheet on Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting (FGM/C)

travel.state.gov travel.state.gov

Way back in 2016, Minneapolis-St Paul-Bloomington in Minnesota had the third-highest FGM rate anywhere in USA and Canada :ban:

Looking for stats for FGM in Minnesota and articles I've read about docs and mandated reporters in Minnesota not being prosecuted. They're gone. Scrubbed :mad:
 
So is it true that Tim Waltz never actually was involved in war or battle , he was only ever a military journalist ?

That's a big faux pas if that's what he's doing.

Maybe the members who served on here can relate more to this, but back here, if people embolished or claimed to serve or do something that they never actually did and another person who served in the military heard this false claim and determined that they were lying, the person making the false claim would usually cop a bad hiding from the person or group of persons who actually were in the military or served in actual combat.

I seen JD Vance communicate this faux pas quite clearly and eloquently to this CNN host as well recently.
 
Spartan Sprinter said:
So is it true that Tim Waltz never actually was involved in war or battle , he was only ever a military journalist ?

That's a big faux pas if that's what he's doing.

Maybe the members who served on here can relate more to this, but back here, if people embolished or claimed to serve or do something that they never actually did and another person who served in the military heard this false claim and determined that they were lying, the person making the false claim would usually cop a bad hiding from the person or group of persons who actually were in the military or served in actual combat.

I seen JD Vance communicate this faux pas quite clearly and eloquently to this CNN host as well recently.
Click to expand...

Military journalists, who served in combat zones, unless contientious objectors, carried weapons. Whether or not they carried a weapon, all Soldiers serving in combat zones are considered combat Vets. It used to be that it took seven support Soldiers to support one infantry Soldier in combat, but I don't know what the ratio is today. Support Soldiers found in combat zones include medics, nurses, doctors, medevac pilots, supply, cooks, clerks, graves registration, mechanics, fuel specialists, water and sanitation, communication, explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), engineers, meterologists, cartographers, CHAPLAINS, Chaplain assistants, journalists, etc., etc., etc. Combat arms units include infantry, artillery, and armor. All Soldiers in a combat zone are subject to being attacked and must be able to kill the enemy and break stuff. These days, the front line isn't as defined as it once was.

Governor Walz isn't a combat vet.
He didn't deploy to a combat zone as anything.
He attained the rank of Command Sergeant Major (E-9), but didn't serve two years in grade before retiring, so his retired rank and grade are Master Sergeant/E-8. He is not entitled to use the title Command Sergeant Major in retirement.

His unit did deployment training in preparation for deployment, but IDK if it was routine deployment readiness training that all units do, or if the unit had been alerted to a planned deployment. If the former, the timing of the retirement was fine. However, if the unit had been told of a planned deployment, whether or not a formal alert notice or orders had been received, if he had weenied out by retiring or not pulling back his already-submitted retirement papers, that would have been really uncool because Command Sergeant Majors are pretty key personnel. If this were the case, the unit might have been able to stop his retirement, but the fact that his command allowed him to retire says something about his competence and value to the unit if they knew they were deploying in the not-very-distant future. OTOH, he was National Guard, which has some "different" regulations, so I could be wrong on what he or the unit could have done and when. I've been retired a long time, so I'm sure a lot of active Army stuff has changed, as well.

Stolen valor is serious business and can be prosecuted. The US Stolen Valor Act (2013) criminalizes fraudulent claims of awards and decorations.
 
Ghoti Ichthus said:
Military journalists, who served in combat zones, unless contientious objectors, carried weapons. Whether or not they carried a weapon, all Soldiers serving in combat zones are considered combat Vets. It used to be that it took seven support Soldiers to support one infantry Soldier in combat, but I don't know what the ratio is today. Support Soldiers found in combat zones include medics, nurses, doctors, medevac pilots, supply, cooks, clerks, graves registration, mechanics, fuel specialists, water and sanitation, communication, explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), engineers, meterologists, cartographers, CHAPLAINS, Chaplain assistants, journalists, etc., etc., etc. Combat arms units include infantry, artillery, and armor. All Soldiers in a combat zone are subject to being attacked and must be able to kill the enemy and break stuff. These days, the front line isn't as defined as it once was.

Governor Walz isn't a combat vet.
He didn't deploy to a combat zone as anything.
He attained the rank of Command Sergeant Major (E-9), but didn't serve two years in grade before retiring, so his retired rank and grade are Master Sergeant/E-8. He is not entitled to use the title Command Sergeant Major in retirement.

His unit did deployment training in preparation for deployment, but IDK if it was routine deployment readiness training that all units do, or if the unit had been alerted to a planned deployment. If the former, the timing of the retirement was fine. However, if the unit had been told of a planned deployment, whether or not a formal alert notice or orders had been received, if he had weenied out by retiring or not pulling back his already-submitted retirement papers, that would have been really uncool because Command Sergeant Majors are pretty key personnel. If this were the case, the unit might have been able to stop his retirement, but the fact that his command allowed him to retire says something about his competence and value to the unit if they knew they were deploying in the not-very-distant future. OTOH, he was National Guard, which has some "different" regulations, so I could be wrong on what he or the unit could have done and when. I've been retired a long time, so I'm sure a lot of active Army stuff has changed, as well.

Stolen valor is serious business and can be prosecuted. The US Stolen Valor Act (2013) criminalizes fraudulent claims of awards and decorations.
Click to expand...
Yep Stolen valor seems to be what he's doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top