What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Gavin Newsom to eliminate up to 2 million home gardens in California

Gavin Newsom to eliminate up to 2 million home gardens in California

Effected residents living in Los Angeles, San Diego and Riverside would be responsible for up to $13,000 to bring themselves into compliance

“This policy he is spearheading, also called zone zero, would require that all these good standing trees and vegetation within a five foot radius of your house be removed. And that would include garden plants like fruits and vegetables.
This policy will impact roughly 2 million homes within the state of California. And for somebody living in a part of this state like Los Angeles could cost you up to $13,000 to come into compliance.

More:

 
Gavin Nuisance never stops implementing his contributions to the globalist agenda.
So now he is restricting home gardens.
Sure, push the "wonderful" Bioengineered Lab grown "food" to reduce emissions to "save the planet".
Didn't see this coming, oh but this is California, so its expected, since the looney tunes Democrats ruling class in California are the proxy for the globalists.
We dont need to have The Big One to destroy California, those in power are doing the job on their own 😡
Do I seem a little perturbed?
Residing in California and having to digest these things and feel the impact tends to get annoying.

But their day is coming that they will answer to The Most High God Almighty

"Be assured, an evil person will not go unpunished, but the offspring of the righteous will be delivered"
Proverbs 11:21
 
Pretty balanced article in the LA Times

How Zone Zero, designed to protect California homes from wildfire, became plagued with controversy and delays​

"Officials from both Cal Fire and the state’s Board of Forestry and Fire Protection visited Brentwood, the epicenter of the outrage, and Altadena, where homeowners are trying to figure out how best to rebuild, but did little to assuage the concerns of the Zone Zero proposals’ most vocal critics.
The two groups took turns pointing out homes that seemed to support their claims. The copious, contradictory anecdotal evidence provided no consensus for a path forward. For example, in the Eaton burn area, officials showed residents a home they claimed was spared thanks to its removal of vegetation near the home, but residents noted a home across the street with plenty of plants that also survived."

"Initial attempts by the board to create Zone Zero regulations, as required by a 2020 law, quietly fizzled out after fire officials and experts struggled to agree on how to navigate a lack of authoritative evidence for what strategies actually help protect a home — and what was reasonable to ask of residents.
The Jan. 1, 2023, deadline to create the regulations came and went with little fanfare. A month after the January fires, however, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order resurrecting the efforts and ordering the board to finish the regulations by the end of the year. As the board attempted to restart and speed-run the previous efforts through a series of public meetings, many Californians grew alarmed. They felt the draft Zone Zero requirements — which would be the strictest statewide defensible space rules on the books — were a step too far."

"“The science tells us it doesn’t make sense, but they’re ignoring it because they have to come up with something,” said Thelma Waxman, president of the Brentwood Homeowners Assn.,who is working to certify neighborhoods in her area as fire safe. “If I’m going to go to my members and say, ‘OK, you need to spend $5,000 doing one thing to protect your home,’ it’s not going to be to remove hydrated vegetation.”
Instead, she wishes the state would focus on home-hardening, which has much more compelling research to support its effectiveness.
Tony Andersen, the board’s executive officer, stressed that his team wants to keep requirements evidence-based and reasonable for homeowners. “We’re listening; we’re learning,” he said."

More
 
Back
Top